Words cannot describe….. Just watch…… Seven minutes……
Recently Oracle announced they will offer RedHat Linux support at very competitive rates. Beyond offering some healthy competition for RedHat support Oracle’s commitment also makes Oracle on Linux a single vendor solution for software support.
Microsoft was not far behind in announcing a partnership with Novel for Suse Linux sales support.
Only time will tell what this will do to the Unix/Unix-like OS market but it’s sure to shake things up in the short term.
Here’s something to help you kill another 53 seconds of your Friday. David Leterman gives Microsoft’s Bill Gates a fitting tribute:
Not quite as funny as Bill Gates having Windows crash on him durring a major presentation, but still damned funny.
Thanks to Don Burleson for sending this along to me.
At a news conference today Gates had the following to say:
“I believe with great wealth comes great responsibility – the responsibility to give back to society and make sure those resources are given back in the best possible way, to those in need,” he said. Gates added, “It’s not a retirement, it’s a reordering of my priorities.”
There are unconfirmed reports that Gates then snuck off to put on his Spidey suit.
Does this mean I’m not allowed to hate Bill Gates anymore?
Geek 2.0 meets Geek 1.0
If you’ve been following the “Web 2.0” conversations, are interested in the future of web technology, or just have a half hour or so to kill, you should check out this video of Tim O’Reilly and Bill Gates. In the video from Mix 06 O’Reilly leads off by drawing a paralell between Web 2.0 and Microsoft’s Live Software, a parallel which I’m afraid Gates didn’t (or didn’t want to) understand.
Common Web 2.0 topics came up, like perpetual beta, user added value, RSS, etc. Not surprisingly Gates was clearly uncomfortable with the topics. For example, when O’Reilly brought up the topic of perpetual beta, Gates went to his comfort zone and talked about how Microsoft’s plan to upgrade IE as often as three times per year was cutting edge. Similarly when O’Reilly mentioned the mashup of craig’s list and Google Maps as part of the evolution of the web as a platform rather than continue on that topic, Gates shapes his response into a description of the products Microsoft is developing to compete with Google Maps.
Through the whole presentation it becomes increasingly clear that Gates is only comfortable speaking about his own company’s technology while O’Reilly is talking about the direction of the industry. This is why I say Geek 2.0 meets Geek 1.0. Geek 2.0 (O’Reilly) speaks in terms like standards, technologies, trends, platforms. Geek 1.0 (Gates) speaks in terms like program x, technology b, product t. Geek 1.0 thinks their software vendor should and will innovate within their field, while geek 2.0 reaches out to open-source products and custom mashups and software which will evolve with usage.
Watch the body language in this video. O’Reilly looks like he could be sitting in his living room talking to someone. Gates looks like he’s on trial. Pretty bad since the Mix conference was hosted by Microsoft.